I once took a series of long commuter bus
trips with the same driver who kept decelerating and accelerating even on
stretches of empty highway. This driving pattern make it impossible to concentrate on my
newest software package which promised ecstacy everlasting with indented
paragraphs.
There was something distressingly
familiar about his annoying pattern of false starts, endlessly repeated.
I was reminded of two elephants I had
seen at a small town circus whose performance amounted to just swaying back and
forth to music. In their cage after the
show, they continued to sway, going through their motions, exercising their
stunted expertise. Now, I will begin to
worry about animal rights the morning every child awakens safe and well fed,
but seeing these great beasts moving without challenge or change, in a cycle
of endless beginnings, was truly disturbing.
Thinking about the elephants made me
reconsider my anger at the driver. He
wasn't incompetent. He was bored. Seriously, totally, bored. He was unconsciously re-creating the more
challenging moments of a job which had precious few. He was going through the motions, exercising
a stunted expertise.
I realized that this fidgety, fractured
cycle of false starts, easily interpreted as individual pathology, was a common
reaction to a lack of stimulation and autonomy: In short, to boredom.
I started to see it nearly everywhere.
Smoking, for example, provides the
illusion of autonomy and creativity.
The timing of the light up, the drag and the final flick away provide
illusory moments of control. So called
channel surfing, in which the holder of the remote control continually changes
television channels, gives the illusion of newness, freshness, and the vain
hope of satisfaction. Compulsive pen
clicking, for heavens sake, can been seen as the
endless beginning, ending, and beginning of the cycle of writing.
It is neither coincidence nor evidence of
weak character that people in less interesting jobs have more trouble giving
up smoking. It is for them a major
source of apparent control and creativity.
On a broader level, technology promises
to make work and life more fulfilling—our last and best hope for renewal. And to the extent that it is not externally
imposed, probing the secrets of word processing, for example, does feel
creative and productive. But how long
can the most advanced macro retain its freshness and meaning once it becomes
just another part of the job description?
Secretaries today can manipulate blocks
of words and images with agility and speed worthy of science fiction. What does it do for them? Production line workers can turn out computer
chips and potato chips in infinite profusion.
But the jobs are controlled and designed so that even at Warp 7, its still ... boring.
So advanced, it's simple, brags the
efficiency expert, paid well to reduce other people's work to a series
of daily false starts without challenge or change.
Let 'em eat Marlboros.
Without a core of self generation and
self expression, every technological breakthrough creates a glistening,
metallic structure of promise that cannot help but rust.
Technologically, our workers are all
dressed up and told where to go. Their
jobs make perfect, and hence, no sense to them.
Technology has filled its vacuum with nothing.
We have become a nation bored; a fidgety,
de-skilled nation of channel changing pen clickers, trying desperately to rev
our creative engines, swaying to a frighteningly simple beat.
If idle hands are the Devil's tools, an
idled mind is hell itself.